Behind “Andrew vs. The Collective” on Kickstarter & an update

The Kickstarter Blog has just posted an interview with me about Andrew vs. The Collective. Here’s a quote of myself, in block quotes from another site, selected by myself:

The way I see it, each Kickstarter project’s backing period plays out like a story. You have the main narrative arc (“Will this project reach its funding or not?”), but in order to keep attracting new people, you have to build in some subplots. Some story beats.

Andrew vs. The Collective was essentially a seven-act story: the introduction and then each of the six short stories. Each week the narrative was: “Can Andrew finish this week’s story?”

Go read it!

Meanwhile Project Lazarette is going swimmingly. The book is outlined in detail and I have been cranking through the word creation. It is, like its subject, a monumental task that requires a lot of time just working on it. No silver bullets, just hours of work.

This is what I can tell you so far: There are two main characters. Their names are Daniel Penn and Meg Percy. There are three total parts to the book. I am, today, closing in on the end of the rough draft of the first one.

Word count: 32,093.

Disinteresting the Base: How Whitman Is Going to Beat Brown in November

I watched a lot of local news last night with the Mehserle decision coming down. And thanks to that I saw this ad a lot:

It’s a pretty intense hit-job on the once and future Governor, but I’ll say this: it’s really, really well-produced. Where most political ads slide across and away from my consciousness, this one caught and held my attention.

I don’t think the audience for this ad is the independent vote that could decide the race (though I’m sure Meg’s camp would be happy to see those folks won over), the real audience is the hip, urbane, young Democratic base in the media-savvy enclaves. The message of the ad is not “Vote for Meg” it’s simply, “Hey young Dems, just don’t bother voting.”

And I think that strategy could actually work. Brown was unopposed in the Democratic primary. An unopposed Democrat in California! Did you have your eye on a rising party star? (Newsom? Villaraigosa?) Too bad. You got Brown on the ballot and Brown only.

I would argue, contrary to the standard political wisdom, that not being contested in the primary will hurt Brown in the long run. No one had a chance to get excited about Brown – and excitement, we saw in the 2008 Presidential, is crucial to energizing the young Democratic base. (And also to ginning up one of those small donation money machines like Obama had.)

And so despite the independent voters the pundits will talk about everyone chasing, Meg (who doesn’t need anybody’s money except Meg’s) just has to do one crucial thing between now and November: Disinterest the Democratic base.

And with media buys like this, I’d say she’s off to a good start.

(Caveat: The X factor in November will be legalization. There are an awful lot of those same young Democrats who, smokers or not, will want to cast their vote on such potentially historic legislation. And maybe, just maybe, pot will save Jerry Brown in the end.)

West Wing: Dated and Relevant

For my research on Project Lazarette I needed to get a good sense of the political ecology of Washington. Alexis suggested I needed little more than The West Wing.

How fortuitous that there are seven whole seasons of it and I’ve never seen an episode!

I’m almost at the finale of season one and I’ve really been enjoying it – and outside of all the familiar faces (oh hey Peggy from Mad Men, the President’s daughter and Ron from Parks and Recreation, the flannel-wearing wildlife expert) – I’ve found the series both incredibly resonant and dissonant.

Resonant: The series is obviously based on an idealized Clinton White House. (Former Clinton Press Secretary Dee Dee Myers is their consultant.) But where Clinton was sullied with a sex scandal and some ugly political tactics, the Bartlet White House are reliably the good guys. The staffers are politically pragmatic but ultimately idealistic. They hew to good strong moderate policies but they still believe in the power of government to change the world for the better (in fact they talk about it in those terms with one another). So why is that resonant today? Because it sounds a hell of a lot like an Obama White House (perhaps with the subtraction of Rahm Emmanuel). An idealized, centrist egghead Commander-in-Chief and his young, idealistic staff who are there to change the world. (And surely I’m not the first to point out the Jon Favreau/Rob Lowe similarity.)

So how is it dissonant? As relevant as the series may seem on the political front, it looks and feels like the product of a long-gone age. Little things: the plot of the first episode revolves around an accidentally-exchanged beeper and one of the hot-button issues of the day is flag-burning. But also the production itself: Where nearly every network drama these days pulls from the cinematographic playbook of NYPD Blue with shaky, urgent, hand-held follow shots – The West Wing (which was a late contemporary to Blue) is all smooth dolly shots or Steadicams. And the music! The score is exactly what you would get from a music library search for “Presidential” – all martial drums and inspiring horns. More than any other element in the series the music draws my friendly snickers. A heavy line of dialogue before the break will go unanswered and then the music will swoop in like a flag-bedecked eagle to remind you that these are Important People Doing Important Things.

Let’s go back to resonant. It’s not hard to imagine that many an Obama staffer were following along with those swoops before and after commercials and with all the trials and tribulations of the Bartlet White House. And in some way (perhaps un/sub-consciously) it’s easy to think those same staffers are today emulating those same idealistic fictions.

But if the arc of The West Wing is resonant with the present administration (and possibly presents an unconscious roadmap for its staff) – is it possible that the very idea of an idealistic centrist Democratic administration is as quaint and dated as the rat-tat-tat of the snare drums that open each episode? We no longer think the closing monologue of a Deputy Director of Communications deserves soaring orchestration – or if it did, it would be in a Mr. Smith Goes to Washington fit of political naivete.

Season One shifts with the Bartlet Administration making a big gambit of its own idealism: stirring things up and tacking away from a centrist focus on reelection. Their poll numbers are down because they don’t do enough (and indeed, I wonder if in the real world of 1999/2000 the ratings for the show were down due to their inaction). So they decided to do something about it. As we look at the Obama Administration’s flagging poll numbers I can’t help but wonder how many of its members are calling back to that first season of The West Wing and quietly arguing in the break room that that’s what they need to do. Take a stand! Shift peoples’ opinion in their favor!

But, watching this series today I can’t help but ask: If the Obama Administration unleashed the full force of its election-season idealism upon the present-day DC, would that feel as quaint and hokey as the credit music of The West Wing?

Big News: I’m leaving Current

Last week I alluded to some big news coming up – and it’s here: This week will be my last week with Current TV.

I’ve been with Current since the month it launched, have had the opportunity to work on some of the most interesting projects in media in the last five years, and have learned and grown more from this one company than I could have from five different companies in quintuple the time. But for me, right now, it’s time to move on.

Why? What am I leaving to go do? Well, honestly – to write! I’ve got a lot of momentum going and I want to capitalize on that. For the next few months I’m going to be a full-time writer. (Crazy, right?) What will I attempt to accomplish in that time?

  • Write the first rough draft of the newly-christened Project Lazarette (thank you Amanda for that awesome name and my new nautical project naming system). It’ll be my second full-length novel and I think it’s shaping up to be a really great one.
  • Find myself a literary agent who’s willing to help find me some support/outlets for what I think is going to be a pretty prolific next few years.
  • Find some sort of greater perch for The Collective – either as the self-published book it is now, or by finding it a home with a publisher.
  • Exercise a lot and learn French.*

This Thursday will be my last day in the Current offices and then I’ll waste no time in getting started on Lazarette over the holiday weekend. I plan to give America 10,000 words for her birthday!

And for all you fans of collaborative participatory journalism, don’t worry, I’m not abandoning the good fight – I’m just taking a break!

Look forward to lots more blogging around here!

—-

(* I have this persistent image of the page Nick Carraway finds in Gatsby’s book with his childhood daily schedule. The range of regimented activities he’d undertake for one half hour or quarter hour at a time. My temptation is to make such a schedule, though everyone tells me it’s folly. That said, I’m totally serious about the exercise and the French.)

“FNC Commentator is the New GOP Presidential Candidate”

Amid all the hullabaloo over Gen. Stanley McChrystal’s off-the-cuff quotes in Rolling Stone’s The Runaway General, I found my brain hazily remembering some offhand commentary from a few weeks back that the Right would consider him a strong contender for a 2012 GOP run. Consider that. Could an ex-general take on the incumbent President who fired him? In this political climate? Hell yes. Which got me thinking about what some of the other 2012 GOP hopefuls are doing to bide their time before kicking back off: being commentators on Fox News.

So if McChrystal is fired – how long does it take for him to show up on Fox as a commentator? Months? Weeks? Hours? Tim Carmody of Snarkmarket asks if that might have been his intention all along. A well-executed maneuver if so.

Is it ethical? A fired general becomes the government’s critic on the opposition media outlet? I’m not familiar with American military ethics, but my gut tells me it would be frowned upon. But, these days, completely plausible. (Tim says, “it’s like an ivy league kid getting a job at Goldman Sachs”) And before we throw stones at Fox, CNN picked up Ret. Gen. Russell Honoré to talk about anything Gulf-related.

As a sidenote – I found the article itself really interesting. A good, tough look at the efforts of the counter-insurgency effort in Afghanistan. It’s politically inexpedient for McChrystal to shit-talk his civilian bosses in print, but honestly the piece made me appreciate the work he and his team are doing a lot more. (Open question as to whether or not his strategy is working.) This was a particularly great scene that I was surprised to find a little endearing:

The general’s staff is a handpicked collection of killers, spies, geniuses, patriots, political operators and outright maniacs. There’s a former head of British Special Forces, two Navy Seals, an Afghan Special Forces commando, a lawyer, two fighter pilots and at least two dozen combat veterans and counterinsurgency experts. They jokingly refer to themselves as Team America, taking the name from the South Park-esque sendup of military cluelessness, and they pride themselves on their can-do attitude and their disdain for authority. After arriving in Kabul last summer, Team America set about changing the culture of the International Security Assistance Force, as the NATO-led mission is known. (U.S. soldiers had taken to deriding ISAF as short for “I Suck at Fighting” or “In Sandals and Flip-Flops.”)…. By midnight at Kitty O’Shea’s, much of Team America is completely shitfaced. Two officers do an Irish jig mixed with steps from a traditional Afghan wedding dance, while McChrystal’s top advisers lock arms and sing a slurred song of their own invention. “Afghanistan!” they bellow. “Afghanistan!” They call it their Afghanistan song.

McChrystal steps away from the circle, observing his team. “All these men,” he tells me. “I’d die for them. And they’d die for me.”

Go read it!

UPDATE: Tim blogged about it too! He expands on his theory that this was planned by McChrystal, AND is pretty sure that Obama is Billy Crudup.

Researching is a Massive Public Work

A lot going on – and big news/updates to come – but I wanted to talk a little bit about research. I’m busy getting ready to write my second novel (but I guess my third book?). And this time I’m trying to do everything about this process “right.” The Collective, you remember, was a National Novel Writing Month book. I jumped in with eyes squeezed shut, outlining as I went, discovering the plot as it flowed from my fingers. That process was a lot of fun, but it meant the editing process, once I started to try to make sense of what I’d written, was a 12-month chore.

With this next book I want to cut that time down – and I aim to do it by smartly outlining and researching ahead of time. (Like a real book!) That’s the part I’m in right now – and it’s been a lot of fun, actually. I’ve got books and movies in a big long list. I’ve got a Scrivener document with ideas for scenes and characters. And I read for hours at a time and feel like I’ve accomplished much. Of course the danger is to get sucked in and research for forever. But I’ve set myself a due date – I’ll start writing in earnest on July 2. (Happy Birthday America, I got you 10,000 words!)

What’s the research been? Massive earth-changing projects. I read Dam! about the Hetch-Hetchy and right now I’m reading Path Between the Seas about the Panama Canal. (PBTS, BTW is an incredible book. The founding of the Republic of Panama reads like a Joseph Conrad page-turning spy thriller.) Next up in my queue: a book on Baron Haussmann remaking Paris and Ferdinand de Lesseps digging the Suez Canal.

Anything else you think I should read?

Also – I guess I should come up with a Sloanian codename for this next project, huh? That’s to come (though let me know if you have any suggestions).

The Collective is for sale!

Today I finally mailed the last of the copies of the books for my Kickstarter backers. Which means…

At long last my novel is for sale online! You can buy it in the Lulu marketplace.

If you’ve already got a copy, leave me a review! Let everybody know what you thought of the book. Or at least the good bits.

A new look for Current and 48 hour magazine

It’s been a while since I blogged, and boy have I been busy. I had all those books to mail for Andrew vs. The Collective (address-sending stragglers, yours’ go out this weekend!) and things have been busy-busy at the old office.

A personal highlight: I had a story picked up for 48 Hour Magazine! It’s called “Meet, Prey, Kill” (thanks Alexis for that title) and you can read it in print if you buy the magazine!

And then then on professional side: I’ve been running the homepage editorial for Current.com for the last few months and just last week that took an exciting new turn: this beautiful creation:

Current's hot new homepage

Look at that marquee! It’s gorgeous! The new design is courtesy Current’s longtime online designer Rod Naber who after five great years is leaving at a high point to go join the startup Rdio. Congrats Rod!

That’s not all the big news for Current. Last night we premiered a half hour special where Laura Ling talked about her imprisonment in North Korea. Powerful, heart-wrenching stuff. (You can watch that online here.) And next Wednesday the Vanguard documentary series starts up again with Missionaries of Hate about the Uganda anti-gay legislation and the influence of American evangelical leaders. That’s reported by Mariana van Zeller who just won a Peabody for her work last season. (Go Mariana!)

All right, all right, enough work-stuff. What about me? My book-designing, printing, shipping hiatus from writing is at last coming to an end. I’m beginning research this weekend on what will be my next novel.

I’ve decided with this one to pursue a relatively traditional path both of writing (no Collective, no NaNoWriMo) and distribution (agent –> publisher –> your local bookstore). So, if anybody has any agent/publisher friends/acquaintances they’d like to introduce me to – I’m looking!

The day I realized I’d never escape 1940

Via Gizmodo: Time Traveler Captued in Museum Photograph

The day I went to see them open the bridge was the day I realized I’d never escape 1940. Or at least, wouldn’t escape it in any way but the normal byway into 1941 and subsequently the war and 1942 and beyond. I’d never see 2006 again, not for a long, long time. After Mary Sue flung her chubby little hand out toward the dashboard, slapping open the glove box and breaking the fragile plastic tube that kept the Ununhexium inert and in this dimension, I felt the dread certainty of a man marooned. Don’t fool around with the local talent, crazy Uncle Waldo used to tell me. They called him crazy because before he married my aunt he claimed to be from the next century. From the 2000s. He got back there all right. A grey-haired curmudgeon with a tinkerer’s hand and pied piper’s skill at entrancing his little nephews. Local talent. Sheesh. I’d have to adopt a crazy Austrian accent too, pronounce the first letter of my name as a V instead of a W. Hmm, maybe I’d wait another five to six years first.

I’m really into stories of time travelers caught in image. I might write a book of their stories one day. If you see any – send them to me!

Also, in microfiction: Robin Sloan’s new volcanic brainstorm: Ash Cloud Tales.

The Wire of novels

March 23, 2010 Andrew Fitzgerald 4 comments

In my endless cascade of open browser tabs I found this post by author Pamela Redmond Satran on Novelr. It’s called “Reinventing the Novel” and I think I didn’t bother reading it before “Clean Out Browser Tab Day” because every week there’s another slate of ‘reinventing the ____’ stories that I open, skim, and close. But there was actually an idea in this one that really struck me:

…my husband, after watching the DVD of American Gangster, [told] me he found the movie good enough but ultimately unsatisfying. “It was a movie,” he explained, “so you knew from the beginning that everything really interesting was going to happen to Denzel Washington and Russell Crowe, and that it was going to build to this big climax at the end.”

That was the problem with conventional novels too, I thought. They were predictable, limited and finite in form and scope. Wouldn’t it be more interesting to write – and read – a novel that unfolded in a way that was both more leisurely and more compelling, the way TV shows like Mad Men and The Wire did?

Yes! Totally right. Even as I was writing The Collective, my goal was to tie up the ending in the way that felt right. In other words, that would resonate with readers as the appropriate ending. (I won’t tell you what that is.) But that was because I wanted to fit into the format of the novel. Now, one could write a format buster – a novel in episodes (like If one a winter’s night a traveler… or Cloud Atlas) or one that subverts the reader’s expectations (and probably leaves most feeling unsatisfied). But then you’re looking at a slimmer audience.

But what about new formats? In the way that The Wire (and The Sopranos and others) took the “television drama” format and the “movie” format and melded them together into something exponentially longer and exponentially more interesting?

Satran’s attempt is called Ho Springs. It’s an online novel. And I was too excited about this initial idea to read through it before posting, but I’m going to be checking it out.

Any other examples out there you guys know of?

UPDATE (one minute later): Now I’m thinking about the worlds of video games. Robin convinced me over the holidays to buy Dragon Age: Origins, the first video game I’ve bought in about ten years. He sold me on it because the story was so dense. Maybe the format buster of the novel is something more along these lines?